Obama, plain and simple

[flo]

What a Black Columnist has to say about Obama.


Ken Blackwell, Columnist for the New York Sun

It's an amazing time to be alive in America . We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election--the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first front-running freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first!

We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.

The reality is this:  Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and it's time America takes a closer and deeper look at him.

Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.

Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost. 

Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America . But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial 'beauty.'

Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadine jad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists--something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.

Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck!

Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise and glory to God!' but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked' - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing.  In Illinois , he refused to vote against a statewide ban--ban on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood , and San Francisco values, not Middle America values.

The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of 'bringing America together' means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs.

But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.

It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war. 

[sixdogsmom]

And who do you support and why?

[Dee Gee]

I'm not supporting any of the candidate but I will have to vote against either Obama or Clinton.

[W. Gray]

Dee Gee, that may be the thinking of most reasonable Americans.

[flo]

I am not pleased with any of the candidates, as I have plainly stated before.  Personally, I was leaning towards John Edwards, were he to win the nomination, and now in light of this weeks events, he's not really someone I'm happy with.  Maybe as it gets closer to election, things will become clearer and it will be easier to make a choice.  I certainly hope so anyhow.  I would like to have my mind made up before I go to the polls.

[Lookatmeknow!!]

I am with you on that one Flo.  There isn't a clear GOOD candiadate.  I just don't know what to do, but I know I will vote!!  Just not sure, WHO!!!

[flo]

I'm not supporting any of the candidate but I will have to vote against either Obama or Clinton.

are you really ready for four more years of Bush?

[Dale Smith]

I've kept my mouth shut on all the political opinions... and I probably should now.  But, I have to agree with Flo.   Voting against Clinton or Obama is 4 more years of McSame.  The Bush administration has trashed America... can anybody with a logical, thinking brain actually want 4 more years of failed policy - failed economic policy, failed foreign policy, just plain failure?  I just don't get it.

[sixdogsmom]

Is anyone excited by the Libertarian candidate who announced last week?

[Dee Gee]

No, I'm not ready for another 4 years of Bush but I do think McCain is a better choice than either Obama or Clinton again.