This and That...

[Warph]

MSNBC's Nigga Joy Reid: Obama Should Not
"Appease" Republican "Terrorists"

"You're toast, Reid"

(Former Governor Ed Rendell stepped into Racist Reid's pile of sh!t.  Reid's statement, however, is nothing short of slander and racism of an entire movement.  Broadcasters used to believe that this kind of behavior reflected poorly on them personally, let alone their industry.  There once was an industry-wide belief in the mission to civilize and inform... but not anymore.  MSNBC is a cesspool of pure PUS!  The kind of statement made by Racist Reid, intended to inflame a racially tense situation ignited by a private citizen with unconscionable views, is an intentional, naked, and inexcusable effort to gin up racial hatred.  You will not find a more wretched human being on this planet than Joy Reid)

Via Newsbusters:

Former Governor Ed Rendell (D-Pa.) drifted a bit too far off MSNBC's pro-Obama message on Thursday's Now with Alex Wagner, receiving a strong left-wing rebuke after suggesting that President Obama should be willing to compromise with Republicans on upcoming budgetary battles.


MSNBC [Puke] contributor Joy Reid likened Republicans to terrorists, claiming that the president's situation is like "when somebody is threatening to bomb the stadium." Reid rejected Rendell's call for bipartisanship, instead pushing her offensive analogy even further:

"You don't go out and make a speech about how you're willing to dismantle the stadium in order to appease them."

[Warph]

Gallup: Americans Overwhelmingly Oppose College Admissions
Based On Affirmative Action, 67%-28%

(Sanity prevails)

PRINCETON, NJ — Two-thirds of Americans believe college applicants should be admitted solely based on merit, even if that results in few minorities being admitted, while 28% believe an applicant's racial and ethnic background should be taken into account to promote diversity on college campuses. Three-quarters of whites and 59% of Hispanics believe applicants should be judged only on merit, while blacks are divided in their views.[/b]

[Warph]

A Love Story

Weenie's Sexting Partner:
"He Told Me He (sniff) Woved Me"

(Huh?   He had already resigned from Congress for doing the same
exact thing the two of them were doing)

Sydney Leathers, the woman at the center of the latest Anthony Weiner sext scandal, told Inside Edition that the New York City mayoral candidate told her that he loved her, and that she said told him the same.

Leathers had the following exchange with Inside Edition's correspondent:

Q: "You told Anthony Weiner that you loved him?
A: "Yes"
Q: "Did he tell you he loved you?"
A: "Yes."

"I cared about him a lot," she said in an exclusive interview set to air tomorrow, but admitted she didn't quite love him at the time. "He was very important to me."
Leathers says her feelings have since changed, especially after watching the disgraced former congressman at Tuesday's press conference with his wife, Huma Abedin. "I'm disgusted by him. He's not who I thought he was," she said. She also offered [Huma]Abedin a tear-filled apology.

As Weiner was preparing for his mayoral campaign, Leathers said he asked her to delete their correspondences. "He was trying to be someone he wasn't," she explained.

Leathers is one of at least three women Weiner has now admitted to having sexually-explicit correspondences with since his resignation from Congress in 2011. Leathers, an Indiana native, is a 23-year-old former field organizer for the Obama campaign.



.

[Warph]

ObuttHead To Tell Congress They Won't Declare Morsi Ouster
By Egyptian Military A Coup, Paves Way For U.S. Aid
To Continue Flowing

(Even though it was a blatant coup.  This was a prime opportunity to stop giving billions of dollars annually to a country that hates our guts)

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration will tell lawmakers Thursday that it won't declare Egypt's government overthrow a coup, U.S. officials said, allowing the United States to continue providing $1.5 billion in annual military and economic aid to the Arab world's most populous country.

William Burns, the State Department's No. 2 official, will hold closed-doors briefings with members of the House and Senate just a day after Washington delayed delivery of four F-16 fighter jets to Egypt. It was the first U.S. action since the military ousted Mohammed Morsi as president, imprisoned him and other Muslim Brotherhood members and suspended the constitution earlier this month.

The administration has been forced into difficult contortions to justify not declaring a coup d'etat, which would prompt the automatic suspension of American assistance programs under U.S. law. Washington fears that halting such funding could imperil programs that help to secure Israel's border and fight weapons smuggling into the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, among other things seen as critical to U.S. national security.

It's unclear what specific arguments it will present Thursday, but the officials said Burns will explain how the administration has yet to make any coup determination and that it doesn't plan to do so in the future as Egypt moves to restore civilian governance and hold new democratic elections. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak publicly ahead of the private meetings.

[Warph]

Harry Reid: Old Pant Suits Will Be An "Even Better" President Than Bubba

(Bubba was a great president?  He lucked out with the Internet taking off during his term which led to a tech bubble, he had absolutely nothing to do with it.  Hillary helped overturn an election, then lied for panderer, adulteror and perjuror Bill, then lied some more for Barry Sotero and as Dept of State den mother... so it is only natural she expects the "right" to lie again as presidentette!

And why is Wimp Boehner dragging his feet on Benghazi, Cotrzine, Holder fast & furious, NSA, IRS, etc. ? ??)

Via NPR:

JUDY WOODRUFF: Finally, 2016, forgive me. In 2008, Senator, you were one of the first prominent figure in Washington to come out for then-Sen. Barack Obama for president, choosing him over Hillary Clinton. Of course, we know what happened. Should she run in 2016, and if she did, do you think she would win the election? What do you think her chances are?

HARRY REID: Hillary Clinton may have a bigger fan than Harry Reid; I just don't know who it would be. I think that what she did as a senator, what she did as secretary of state will go down in history books as a remarkable, remarkable job that she did. I, of course, have such admiration for the president. Remember, the last three or four years he was here we reduced the debt and created 22 million jobs – pretty good deal. And I think that they're a pretty good team, but she'll handle things probably even better than he did.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Oh, is that right? Even better?

HARRY REID: Oh, yeah.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Would you like to see her run?

HARRY REID: I don't know what more I can say than — to be a cheerleader for — than what I've already said in this interview.

[Warph]

Pelosi Blasts "Clueless" Dem Perverts Weiner, Filner Over
"Reprehensible" Treatment Of Women, "They Need Therapy"

(Oh, oh... Weiner is toast)

Via Free Beacon:

Q: Madam Leader, as one of the most prominent Democratic politicians, I'm curious about your take on former Congressman Weiner's latest transgression, having repeated the same action that occurred for his resignation in Congress. Do you have any new –

REP. PELOSI: So should I be thinking of you as sort of a social issue kind of a guy here? (Laughs.) We're here — we're legislators. But I appreciate your question. I think that — I'm — I think I'm — spoken and acted in terms of Anthony Weiner and in terms of when he was in the Congress of the United States. In his case, in the case of Mayor Filner, clearly, they have both admitted they need therapy. I think maybe that therapy could better be accomplished in private.

Q: Should he stay in the race?

REP. PELOSI: That's up to the people of New York.

Q: Mrs. Pelosi, next week it looks like the House is going to take up –

REP. PELOSI: Let me just say, before I leave that — let me be very clear. The conduct of some of these people that we're talking about here is reprehensible. It is so disrespectful of women. And what's really stunning about it is they don't even realize it. You know, they don't have a clue. And it is really — if they're clueless, get a clue.

[Warph]

A Plan for Dealing With John Boehner

by Doug Ross

I think we can all agree that John Boehner is a complete and utter failure as House Speaker. Marble-mouthed, unprincipled, double-dealing and cowardly are among the more positive attributes I can think of. Consider the man's actions over the two-and-a-half years that have elapsed since the Tea Party movement and Constitutional Conservatives brought him to power:

• Despite an unprecedented series of White House scandals -- including, but not limited to gun-running to Mexican drug cartels, the Benghazi cover-up, IRS-gate, and repeated perjurious testimony to Congress -- John Boehner refuses to name a Select Investigative Committee or demand a Special Prosecutor.

• In fact, in the case of the Benghazi cover-up, even though 75 percent of House Republicans want a Select Committee formed, Boehner refuses. That's right: John Boehner refuses to name a Special Committee on Benghazi, with dedicated budget, resources and staff -- and won't even tell us why.

• And what could be the reason? Some have speculated that Boehner has secretly cut a deal with Democrats in exchange for, well, who knows? Suffice it to say that if John Boehner is negotiating for you, you're going to walk out of the room wearing only your underwear. My guess is he really has cut a secret deal with Obama and Reid, perhaps regarding the debt ceiling or some other act of surrender that sells out the American people in exchange for his consolidation of more power.

• And what is John Boehner's top priority right now? That's right: Amnesty. Legalizing tens of millions of illegal aliens, which we know for a fact will vote by a stunning 8-to-1 margin for Democrats. Brilliant.

• As for de-funding Obamacare? That, too, Boehner refuses to do, instead holding fan-dance votes to repeal Obamacare, knowing that said bills will never see the light of day in the Senate. The Constitution grants the House of Representatives the power of the purse. Boehner could de-fund Obamacare -- completely -- if he wished, letting Obama try to rally support for his despotic and failed testament to central planning. But this Boehner will not do, because it requires brains, courage, principles and cojones.


So what do we do about John Boehner?

While there are grassroots efforts emerging to primary Boehner in Ohio's 8th District -- and we wish them all possible success -- the time has come to consider an alternative plan. A nuclear option, if you will.

Assuming that Boehner wins his primary in OH-8, I suggest we rally support among Tea Party and Constitutional Conservatives in that district to vote. To vote Democrat.

That single seat has virtually no chance of swinging the majority in the House one way or the other. A newly elected Democrat in that very Red seat will be a back-bencher and virtually powerless. This will give time to the district (and it is a very conservative district by all accounts) to assemble a credible candidate should one not emerge in 2014.

I would never advocate such a tactic in the Senate even though Mitch McConnell is Boehner-lite. In the Senate the odds of taking majority control are simply too tempting to chance returning the dimwitted crackpot from Searchlight, Nevada to a seat of power.

But Boehner, on the other hand, is such an egregious failure, such a cowardly and un-principled operator, that he must be ripped out of the Speaker's chair by any means necessary.

Let's see what happens in OH-8, but I suggest we fund and vociferously support any -- and I do mean any -- Boehner opponent. Enough is enough.

[Warph]

Did George Zimmerman Get Away With Murder?
The [MSM] media are reporting that a juror says Zimmerman is guilty of murder.

That's not true.

(It's almost like the media has an agenda here.  It's worth noting the far-left rag Salon is the one
who caught what ABC did with their selective editing)

Via Salon:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/frame_game/2013/07/did_george_zimmerman_get_away_with_murder_no_juror_b29_is_being_framed.single.html


Did George Zimmerman get away with murder? That's what one of his jurors says, according to headlines in the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and dozens of other newspapers. Trayvon Martin's mother and the Martin family's attorney are trumpeting this "new information" as proof that "George Zimmerman literally got away with murder."

The reports are based on an ABC News interview with Juror B29, the sole nonwhite juror. She has identified herself only by her first name, Maddy. She's been framed as the woman who was bullied out of voting to convict Zimmerman. But that's not true. She stands by the verdict. She yielded to the evidence and the law, not to bullying. She thinks Zimmerman was morally culpable but not legally guilty. And she wants us to distinguish between this trial and larger questions of race and justice.

ABC News hasn't posted a full unedited video or transcript of the interview. The video that has been broadcast—on World News Tonight, Nightline, and Good Morning America—has been cut and spliced in different ways, often so artfully that the transitions appear continuous. So beware what you're seeing. But the video that's available already shows, on closer inspection, that Maddy has been manipulated and misrepresented. Here are the key points.

1. The phrase "got away with murder" was put in her mouth. Nightline shows ABC interviewer Robin Roberts asking Maddy: "Some people have said, 'George Zimmerman got away with murder. How do you respond to those people who say that?' " Maddy appears to reply promptly and confidently: "George Zimmerman got away with murder. But you can't get away from God." But that's not quite how the exchange happened. In the unedited video, Roberts' question is longer, with words that have been trimmed from the Nightline version, and Maddy pauses twice, for several seconds, as she struggles to answer it. "... George Zimmerman ... That's—George Zimmerman got away with murder. But you can't get away from God."

You have to watch her, not just read her words, to pick up her meaning. As she struggles to answer, she looks as though she's trying to reconcile the sentiment that's been quoted to her... that Zimmerman "got away with murder"... with her own perspective. So she repeats the quote and adds words of her own, to convey what she thinks: that there's a justice higher than the law, which Zimmerman will have to face. She thinks he's morally culpable, not legally guilty.


2. She stands by the verdict. ABC's online story about the interview ends with Maddy asking, "Did I go the right way? Did I go the wrong way?" But that's not the whole quote. In the unedited video, she continues: "I know I went the right way, because by the law and the way it was followed is the way I went. But if I would have used my heart, I probably would have [gone for] a hung jury." In another clip, she draws the same distinction: "I stand by the decision because of the law. If I stand by the decision because of my heart, he would have been guilty." At one point, she says that "the evidence shows he's guilty." Roberts presses her: "He's guilty of?" Maddy answers: "Killing Trayvon Martin. But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty." That's the distinction she's trying to draw here: Killing is one thing. Murder or manslaughter is another.


3. She thinks the case should never have gone to trial. According to ABC News, when Roberts asked "whether the case should have gone to trial,"
Maddy answered, "I don't think so.  I felt like this was a publicity stunt."

[Warph]

Pentagon Considering "Affirmative Action" With Separate Training Systems
For Women In The Military, To "Maximize Success Of Women"

(...and just what the hell does this mean? 
Turning them into hard-nose bitchy housewives)

Via Daily Caller:

Senior military personnel are considering new giving women different military training than men, The Washington Times reports.

The effort was proposed by Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Niki Tsongas at a recent House Armed Services Committee hearing because so far, she says training systems do not "maximize the success of women."

Though the armed services have promised that combat standards will be the same regardless of gender, senior officers are considering initially separate training systems.

Army Lt. Gen. Howard Bromberg, serving as deputy chief of staff for personnel, considers separate training programs to be more about considering all soldiers as individuals, citing a need to explore how the training process works.

"We're not looking at it just for the integration of women," Bromberg said. "We're looking at it for the total soldier, because just as you have a 110-pound male who may lack some type of physiological capability or physical capability, he or she may both need to be trained differently. We're trying to expand our understanding of how we train."

[Warph]

Emperor Obuma Again Waives Congressional Ban
On Aid To The Palestinians

(Of course he waits until Friday afternoon to make the announcement.  Once a Muslim, always a Muslim, huh Barry?  Your Impeachment is long over due, Sh!tHead)

Via Washington Times:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2013/jul/26/obama-again-waives-ban-palestinian-aid/

Obama on Friday afternoon ordered another waiver of congressional restrictions on direct funding of the Palestinian Authority, clearing the way for more U.S. aid.

In the one-page order, Mr. Obama said he was taking the action due to the "national security interests" of the U.S. The move comes as the administration is preparing to host renewed direct talks in Washington between Palestinians and Israelis for the first time since 2010.

The president in March directed about $500 million to be sent to the Palestinian Authority, also waiving the restrictions set by Congress. At the time, Secretary of State John F. Kerry said he was seeking to move another $200 million to the Palestinians.