Mich. governor signs 48-month welfare limit

Started by kshillbillys, September 07, 2011, 05:12:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

kshillbillys

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Gov. Rick Snyder on Tuesday signed into law a stricter, four-year lifetime limit on cash welfare benefits, prompting advocates for the poor to warn that tens of thousands of residents will find themselves without cash assistance on Oct. 1.

Michigan's first-year Republican chief executive said the state will offer exemptions to the limit for those with a disability who can't work, those who care for a disabled spouse or child and those who are 65 or older and don't qualify for Social Security benefits or receive very low benefits.

Some recipients who are the victims of domestic violence also may be temporarily exempted.

"We are returning cash assistance to its original intent as a transitional program to help families while they work toward self-sufficiency," Snyder said in a statement. He noted that the state still will help the poor by offering food stamps, health care coverage through Medicaid, child care and emergency services.

Then-Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat, signed a bill that created a four-year limit starting in 2007. But that law exempted many welfare recipients, including those whose caseworkers said they were making progress toward finding employment.

The 2010 election of Snyder and the simultaneous Republican takeover of the Michigan House gave the GOP a free hand to set its own course on public assistance.

The change gives Michigan the Midwest's toughest welfare time limit, according to a survey by The Detroit News. It said there are five-year limits in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio and Wisconsin. Indiana has a two-year limit for adults — but none for children.

Gilda Jacobs of the Michigan League for Human Services said she expects about 41,000 people to lose their cash assistance payments on Oct. 1 when the state's new budget year begins. That includes 29,700 children, according to the Michigan Department of Human Services.

"We're very, very concerned," Jacobs said. "As the days go by, new people will be meeting the 48-month limit. ... More will be falling off that cliff."

The new law will reduce the number of children and adults receiving cash assistance by nearly a fifth, from more than 221,000 to around 180,000. Enforcing a four-year limit will save the state more than $60 million annually, according to a House Fiscal Agency analysis.

Jacobs said it's hard to see how 11,000 adults will find a job when Michigan's July unemployment rate was 10.9 percent, tied with South Carolina for third-highest in the nation.

"We still have to preserve a safety net for people who, through no fault of their own, can't find a job," she said, noting that most cash assistance goes to help poor residents pay their rent. "There's obviously a lot of anxiety out there. Folks aren't sure exactly what this means to them."

State officials say they're working with nonprofit organizations to direct welfare recipients to other services and provide a "soft landing" as they lose benefits. Recipients will be connected with other resources, given housing and job placement assistance for up to three months beyond October and mentored by trained job navigators.

"Michigan continues to face financial challenges, and the fiscal reality is that we cannot afford to provide lifetime cash assistance to recipients who are able to work," Health and Human Services director Maura Corrigan said in a statement. "Enforcing lifetime limits for cash assistance ensures that available funds are targeted toward those recipients who need a helping hand while they find employment."

Michigan ranked 38th in child poverty for 2009, defined as income below $21,756 for a family of two adults and two children. About 23 percent of Michigan's children lived in poverty in 2009, compared with 20 percent nationally. In 2000, only 14 percent of Michigan children lived in poverty. The average age of a child in a family receiving cash assistance is around 7 years old.

Snyder, a Republican, has said reducing the number of children living in poverty is a priority of his administration.

The Michigan Catholic Conference has objected to the four-year limit. The conference said the effect will be felt for years by society and by children who lose services.

ROBERT AND JENNIFER WALKER

YOU CALL US HILLBILLYS LIKE THAT'S A BAD THING! WE ARE SO FLATTERED!

THAT'S MS. HILLBILLY TO YOU!

Diane Amberg

Perhaps the Catholic Conference should get in there and help their own parishioners.  With all the exemptions listed, the people who need help the most should still be alright for the time being.

redcliffsw

For years now, certain protestant churches and catholic have been advocating and promoting the Fed's and/or State to do more for the poor.  Those same churches ought to be caring for their own instead of encouraging the government to take money from others for government re-distribution to the poor.  

These churches are lacking respect for individual liberty.  There's no defense of the biblical doctrine by many churches and their hiearchies promote socialism in lieu of the Bible and the Constitution.  It's difficult to call them churches when they are surely more like organizations.

srkruzich

Christ specifically said that the job of taking care of the needy and the widowed and poor is the job of the church.   Secondly he also said if a man does not support his family he is worse than an infidel.   And third he also said that if you don't work you don't eat.   

Pretty clear and cut statements.  Note his third statement does not mean those who cannot work.  When they cannot work then they fall under the churchs care.  He specifically left out men in his poor, widowed and needy and then added the third statement which obviously common sense will dictate that if the man cannot work for whatever reason, then he is included.


Curb your politician.  We have leash laws you know.

Diane Amberg

"Certain" Protestant churches?  Being a little judgmental today? yeeks!.

redcliffsw

Quote from: Diane Amberg on September 08, 2011, 10:02:33 AM
"Certain" Protestant churches?  Being a little judgmental today? yeeks!.

Churches used to never consider promoting socialism and thievery by and thru government.

I can think of another church that protests at funerals and that's not good either.

There's still some churches that do neither of the above.




SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk