There are many times that the views of this Centrist Moderate line up with those that are further to the right of the political spectrum. There are even times that my views line up with those that are about as far right as you can get. This is one of them.
The federal government's frequent abuses of the Clean Water Act over the past two or three presidential administrations are nothing short of uncompensated takings of private property rights, to me even more egregious than the frequent misuse of eminent domain.
This particular case involves 445 acres of fairly level land that is several miles from the Sacramento River and has a USDA FSA use base for wheat, as that is what it has been used for in the past. Suddenly, with change of ownership, the Corps comes in and says the new owner can't do what the previous owner had done, which is use the land for agricultural production, because it is "in a water of the U. S." This land may have been within a water body during Noah's biblical flood, but is not within any flood zone, designated or observed. The Corps further claims that the land is a wetland based on a 1994 delineation, yet a resurvey in 2012 says it is not, making that part of the Corps' case mute.
It boils down to the Corps of Engineers deciding that this new owner can't do what the previous owner did to the same land. To me that is a taking plain and simple and I hope the Duarte family wins this in court, otherwise many other "new" landowners will be facing the same overzealousness of the Corps.
Charles
The federal government's frequent abuses of the Clean Water Act over the past two or three presidential administrations are nothing short of uncompensated takings of private property rights, to me even more egregious than the frequent misuse of eminent domain.
This particular case involves 445 acres of fairly level land that is several miles from the Sacramento River and has a USDA FSA use base for wheat, as that is what it has been used for in the past. Suddenly, with change of ownership, the Corps comes in and says the new owner can't do what the previous owner had done, which is use the land for agricultural production, because it is "in a water of the U. S." This land may have been within a water body during Noah's biblical flood, but is not within any flood zone, designated or observed. The Corps further claims that the land is a wetland based on a 1994 delineation, yet a resurvey in 2012 says it is not, making that part of the Corps' case mute.
It boils down to the Corps of Engineers deciding that this new owner can't do what the previous owner did to the same land. To me that is a taking plain and simple and I hope the Duarte family wins this in court, otherwise many other "new" landowners will be facing the same overzealousness of the Corps.
Charles