Obama going for the gold

[srkruzich]

You think were not heading for socialism, check this out. It seems that Obama and clinton are going to bypass the constitution and congress and ban all firearms by signing treaties subjecting OUR SOVEREIGNTY under other governments and the UN.

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:56pm EDT

Email | Print |
Share
| Reprints | Single Page
[-] Text

• 
  More News
  Armed violence kills 2,000 a day worldwide: groups
  Tuesday, 6 Oct 2009 08:04pm EDT
  
  By Arshad Mohammed
  
  WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
  
  The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.
  
  U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."
  
  "Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.
  
  While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.
  
  "The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.
  
  However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."
  
  "Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.
  
  The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.
  
  Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.
  
  Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.
  
  The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.
  
  Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.
  
  The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.
  
  The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.  Continued...

[Patriot]

What was that phrase?

Oh yeah... From My Cold, Dead Hand!

[Diane Amberg]

Written by some Muslim?

[srkruzich]

Written by some Muslim?

Not at all!  It was  Charlton Heston

Heston was the president and spokesman of the NRA from 1998 until he resigned in 2003. At the 2000 NRA convention, he raised a rifle over his head and declared that a potential Al Gore administration would take away his Second Amendment rights "from my cold, dead hands." In announcing his resignation in 2003, he again raised a rifle over his head, repeating the five famous words of his 2000 speech. He was an honorary life member.

[Diane Amberg]

Not that! Steve, the reprint from Arshad Mohammed! ROFL