Are you a Constitutionalist?

Started by redcliffsw, October 29, 2009, 11:36:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

redcliffsw

You Might Be A Constitutionalist If . . .
by Chuck Baldwin

I originally published this column back in January of 2005. Since then (and especially lately), many people have called and written with requests to republish it. So, with a few minor revisions, here it is.

More than thirty years as a student of American history, constitutional government, and the Holy Bible leads me to the conviction that the two major political parties in this country (at the national level) are equally culpable in stripping America of its founding principles. In my opinion, both the Democrat and Republican parties in Washington, D.C., have zero fidelity to the U.S. Constitution and zero respect for America's foundational precepts.

In my studied opinion, neither the Democrat nor Republican Party (at the national level) has any intention of slowing the out-of-control expansion of government. Neither party has demonstrated any loyalty to preserving and protecting our constitutional form of government.

Like National Socialists and Soviet Socialists of old, the only thing that concerns Democrats and Republicans today is who is in power. Both are equally willing to destroy the freedoms and liberties of people without conscience or regret as long as their party remains in control.

I am absolutely convinced that without a renewed allegiance to constitutional government and State sovereignty, there can be no resolution to America's current slide into socialism and oppression. Therefore, it is critical that we cast aside our infatuation with partisan politics and steadfastly stand firm for the principles of federalism and freedom, as did America's founders.

Might you be a modern-day Minuteman who understands the principles of freedom and federalism? I offer the following test. Read it and see if you, too, are a Constitutionalist. (Yes, Martha, this is another Jeff Foxworthy spin-off.)

rest of the article:

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20091020.html



Anmar

I got 33/36

I bet thats more than a lot of our "conservative" posters....
"The chief source of problems is solutions"

Varmit

It is high time we eased the drought suffered by the Tree of Liberty. Let us not stand and suffer the bonds of tyranny, nor ignorance, laziness, cowardice. It is better that we die in our cause then to say that we took counsel among these.

flintauqua

So exactly how many can you disagree with and still be a Constitutionist?

Anmar

Quote from: Varmit on October 29, 2009, 05:14:18 PM
Guess again anmar.  35/36. 

Wow billy, so you are against the Iraq and Afghanistan wars?
"The chief source of problems is solutions"

Sarah

I'm actually 36/36, though may be one or two I waver on, but for the most part am and am a member of the Constitution party, though I don't usually vote that way.  Here's their link:
http://www.constitutionparty.com/

So, I guess I beat all of you.   ;D

pamsback

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm............34 out of 36....kinda iffy on two............

Anmar

Quote from: pamsback on October 29, 2009, 09:30:18 PM
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm............34 out of 36....kinda iffy on two............

the religion ones?

I'm still trying to figure out how someone who is pro war got a perfect score.  Being in favor of the wars contradicts 3 or 4 of the questions.
"The chief source of problems is solutions"

pamsback

yeah other than guaranteeing EVERYBODY the right to practice.....think they should just stay out of it.

Varmit

No, I am not against the iraq or afghan wars.  As Commander-in-Chief the President has the authority to defend the nation and take military action without the consent of congress or a declaration of war.  Article 2 Section 2. 
It is high time we eased the drought suffered by the Tree of Liberty. Let us not stand and suffer the bonds of tyranny, nor ignorance, laziness, cowardice. It is better that we die in our cause then to say that we took counsel among these.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk