Obama, Officials May OK Iran's Nuclear Program

Started by kshillbillys, April 06, 2009, 07:22:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

kshillbillys

Obama, Officials May OK Iran's Nuclear Program

Monday, April 6, 2009 10:37 AM

By: Dave Eberhart  Article Font Size   



Officials are mulling whether the U.S. will reverse course and allow Iran to carry out uranium enrichment to produce nuclear fuel only, not weapons-grade material, according to a report in London's Financial Times.


Such a concession, being considered as part of a policy review by President Barack Obama, would be a sea change from the Bush administration's hard-line policy of forbidding uranium enrichment per se.


The development comes superimposed on a backdrop of familiar rhetorical saber-rattling by both countries – with Iran on Monday lambasting Obama's continued characterization of Iran as a "threat," according to a report in Reuters.


Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi reacted to a speech by Obama in Prague declaring that the U.S. would go ahead with plans to build a missile defense shield in Europe as long as Iran posed a threat with its nuclear activities.


"It seems that the repetition of the past U.S. administration's accusations (against Iran) would be in contrast with the slogan of change (by Obama)," Qashqavi said.


But such old-style bickering may mask a starting breakthrough in the persisting U.S.-Iran nuclear impasse.


"There is a growing recognition in [Washington] that the zero [enrichment] solution, though still favored, simply is unfeasible," said Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, according to the Times. "The U.S. may still have zero as its opening position, while recognizing it may not be where things stand at the end of a potential agreement."


Although Obama's Prague declarations were disturbing to Qashqavi, key verbiage hinted at the very change that he found lacking. Obama's overall message to Iran was, "Don't develop a nuclear weapon." Former President George W. Bush was always dead-on specific in calling Iran to halt all enrichment activity, according to the Times.


Meanwhile, a long series of U.N. Security Council resolutions has not minced words – forbidding Iran from all enriching uranium. The European Union, Russia and China have all in the past backed U.S. demands for Iran to halt the process.


A perennially defiant Tehran has stepped up its enrichment activities, installing more than 5,500 centrifuges to enrich uranium. Furthermore, it has systematically collected a stockpile of more than 1,000 kg of low-enriched uranium – a quantity that if further enriched could produce fissile material for one bomb.


Any U.S. backtracking on the enrichment touchstone, however, would ideally be countered by allowing increased access for U.N. inspectors to acquire more information about Iran's enrichment plant in Natanz and other nuclear-related hotspots across the country.


The greater transparency, according to the Times report would allow for warning of any move to enrich uranium to weapons grade levels at such sites.


But even with the current limited inspections at Natanz, there may be enough warning of a move toward a nuclear bomb, some Israeli and U.S. officials privately advise, according to the Times.


ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS ONE?
ROBERT AND JENNIFER WALKER

YOU CALL US HILLBILLYS LIKE THAT'S A BAD THING! WE ARE SO FLATTERED!

THAT'S MS. HILLBILLY TO YOU!

Varmit

What the hell is he thinking???  To allow a county like iran, who has openly said that they want to wipe the US and Isreal off the map to have ANY type of nuclear facility is sucidial.  I know he is an apologist and everything but his continued "reaching out" to our "moderate" enemies for talks, not to mention his monetary support of them is begining to smack of treason.
It is high time we eased the drought suffered by the Tree of Liberty. Let us not stand and suffer the bonds of tyranny, nor ignorance, laziness, cowardice. It is better that we die in our cause then to say that we took counsel among these.

kshillbillys

Treason...Would they just run him out of the country like Benedict Arnold or in this day and age would they execute him for crimes against the United States of America like they did the Rosenbergs whenever they stole and sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union? or maybe we should just let him go on thinking everything will be ok tomorrow and just become one step closer to being a communist society....i lost my train of thought cuz I'm just pissed and thanks for your comment Varmint, you infidel or are you my comrade?------Robert
ROBERT AND JENNIFER WALKER

YOU CALL US HILLBILLYS LIKE THAT'S A BAD THING! WE ARE SO FLATTERED!

THAT'S MS. HILLBILLY TO YOU!

pam

  Well I'd say if they do this they've lost their friggin minds.
Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy.
William Butler Yeats

Varmit

Quote from: kshillbillys on April 06, 2009, 08:27:19 PM
Treason...Would they just run him out of the country like Benedict Arnold or in this day and age would they execute him for crimes against the United States of America like they did the Rosenbergs whenever they stole and sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union? or maybe we should just let him go on thinking everything will be ok tomorrow and just become one step closer to being a communist society....i lost my train of thought cuz I'm just pissed and thanks for your comment Varmint, you infidel or are you my comrade?------Robert

100% American made INFIDEL. 

As for what they should do...I'll pass on stating my pick, but I'm sure you know the answer ;) ;)
laughs menacingly while applying fresh oil to rifle
It is high time we eased the drought suffered by the Tree of Liberty. Let us not stand and suffer the bonds of tyranny, nor ignorance, laziness, cowardice. It is better that we die in our cause then to say that we took counsel among these.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk