The Right to Discriminate . . . .

Started by redcliffsw, October 25, 2014, 07:39:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

redcliffsw


If business owners are not the effective owners of their companies, who is? The answer is government. By mandating that certain businesses serve customers that their owners deem (for whatever reason) unserviceable, government decision-makers become the effective owners. According to the Act's logic, it is government, after all, that licensed the business to operate in the first place. Government, then, should be allowed to determine who can and cannot patron the business. Public accommodations' owners' freedom to engage in commerce is merely an illusion. They are only free as long as they comply with overbearing government regulations.

But this, of course, is no freedom at all.

Of course, some might object and argue that the law should be a means for elected officials to engineer social behavior, or that freedom to engage in commerce really isn't that important. If this is where you stand, then we have more serious disagreements.

Read on:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/10/nicholas-freiling/the-right-to-discriminate/




SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk