Regulators regulate — and that’s our problem

[Warph]

           

The real question is... are these regulators left over from the Clinton/Gore Junta?  In other words, given that virtually every bureaucrat appointed by Clinton had the specific purpose of evading regulations & controls, and paralyzing the regulatory functions of every agency or bureau they were appointed to, are they continuing the purposeful destruction of the federal government that was begun as far back as year one - and accelerated from 1990s on, even with Bush/Cheney?  And, if so, why hasn't Obuma gotten rid of them?  The damage done to the federal government by Clinton & Bush was structural.  Why hasn't it been reversed? 

A better question is why the regulators are making decisions on what the law covers.  I don't agree with Congress about much, but in no case should an unelected official be overriding the laws passed by our elected body of legislators.

Why isn't Congress investigating the regulators?  Or is Major League Baseball as far as they're willing to dig?  Or, if they're turning a blind eye, why might that be? ...Warph




Regulators regulate — and that's our problem
by Deroy Murdock
June 1, 2012
NEW YORK — Federal regulators are keeping America from moving forward. According to recent news stories reviewed by my colleagues at Engage America, federal red tape has squelched at least 736,203 potential jobs. If these positions were filled, today's unemployment rate would fall from 8.1 percent to 7.6.

While some of what regulators do is vital (such as preventing Americans from being poisoned by tap water or detonated by faulty automobile gas tanks) far more is costly, duplicative, or downright destructive.

At worst, regulators who could call or visit citizens to help them obey the law instead order dynamic-entry raids — complete with gun-waving officers in flak jackets and steel helmets. Just ask Gibson Guitar, victims of such a federal SWAT team.

Nonetheless, federal regulators deserve about an inch of slack.

When EPA, FCC, and OSHA staffers go to work, they regulate. If, instead, they cruised Facebook, bought novels on Amazon, or enjoyed Internet pornography (as SEC employees were caught doing) they would neglect their taxpayer-funded duties.

So, these functionaries occupy their desks and concoct fresh ways to enforce the 169,301-page U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Thus, Salt Lake City's Davis High School got socked with a $15,000 fine. While campus administrators followed federal rules and disabled a cafeteria soft-drink vending machine during lunch, they forgot to unplug another soda machine in the book store.

Brigades of federal busybodies perpetrate such nonsense — all of which springs, at least loosely, from laws enacted by congresses and presidents of both parties, spanning decades. Non-Pentagon, executive-branch, civilian employment shrank 11.5 percent under President Bill Clinton, from 1,274,000 to 1,127,000. It then boomed 14.4 percent under Republican socialist George W. Bush. Between 2008 and 2010, Democratic socialist Barack Obama has expanded this headcount 5.5 percent — from 1,289,000 to 1,360,000.

While many of these federal employees do not regulate, per se, some 281,000 of them do, up 13 percent under Obama, estimates John Merline of Investors Business Daily. According to the Competitive Enterprise Institute's Clyde Wayne Crews, these officials imposed 3,807 brand-new rules in 2011, or 15 every federal business day. These new regulations filled 81,247 mind-numbing pages in last year's Federal Register.

Citing a Small Business Administration study, Crews explains in the 2012 edition of Ten Thousand Commandments that complying with these often baffling, frequently self-contradictory edicts cost the U.S. economy $1.75 trillion in 2008. That amount likely is higher today, given this president's new regulatory death stars: Dodd-Frank and ObamaCare. This sum outpaced all U.S. corporate pre-tax profits of $1.3 trillion in 2009.

And that's the point: Every dollar spent to mollify federal authorities is a dollar that cannot be spent to hire new employees, launch new products, or open foreign markets.

Should Uncle Sam snooze while corporations do whatever they want? No.

A new USDA rule called "Control of Listeria Monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Meat and Poultry Products" might make sense, since that food-borne ailment kills 500 Americans annually. (Still, private inspections — a la Underwriters Laboratories — and food irradiation might be superior solutions.)

It is far tougher, however, to justify new Energy Department rules titled "Conservation Standards for Wine Chillers and Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products" and "Efficiency Standards for Microwave Ovens (Standby and Off Mode)." Doctors might smile if the Health and Human Services Department cancelled a new regulation called "Administrative Simplification: Adoption of Authoring Organizations for Operating Rules and Adoption of Operating Rules for Eligibility and Claims Status."

While the U.S. private sector has shriveled, Washington is a boom town. America can survive without the Farm Credit Administration, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and an attic of other outdated or extraneous bureaucracies. Padlock them.

At least 25 percent of regulators should be thanked for their service and dismissed. Those who remain should be instructed to combat fraud, disease, serious injuries, and untimely deaths. Beyond that, Uncle Sam should butt out of America's vending machines and wine chillers.