Like Slimey Cockroaches & their crooked President, Liberals Spread Disease

[Warph]

Dubious donations: Obama's BS edition

Posted on October 25, 2012 by Scott Johnson in 2012 Presidential Election, Campaign finance regulation

       
Earlier this month the Government Accountability Institute report cited chapter and verse showing how the Obama campaign was set up to facilitate illegal foreign contributions (among other kinds of illegal contributions). We wrote about the case study provided by the New York Post a few days ago.

Over at PJ Media, Mike McNally goes the whole nine yards to show how the Obama campaign accepts illegal foreign contributions. McNally is a citizen of the United Kingdom; he provides the details demonstrating the ease with which he was able to make three illegal contributions to the Obama campaign. (His attempted contribution to the Romney campaign was promptly rejected.)

We posted the Obama campaign's response to the GAI report here. The Obama campaign denies that it is doing what the GAI report, the New York Post, and McNally all show them to be doing.

This is about as pure a case of projection as one can find.

I asked GAI president Peter Schweizer for a comment on McNally's post. Peter writes: "Foreign money getting into presidential campaigns continues to create enormous concerns about the presidential electoral process. We need immediate transparency.

What Team Obama has given us is transparent BS."  


Also this today....


Today we learn that President Obama calls Governor Romney "a bullsh*tter" (and does so for publication).

In an upcoming interview with Rolling Stone magazine, President Obama said it was obvious to 6-year-old children that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is a "bullsh*tter."

In Rolling Stone, writer Douglas Brinkley recalls his Oct. 11 meeting with Pres. Obama:

As we left the Oval Office, executive editor Eric Bates told Obama that he had asked his six-year-old if there was anything she wanted him to say to the president. ... [The child] said, "Tell him: You can do it." Obama grinned. ... "You know, kids have good instincts," Obama offered. "They look at the other guy and say, "Well, that's a bullsh*tter, I can tell."

Aw jeez, Barry, you're scum... that wasn't
very presidential, especially to a 6 yr. old child.

[jarhead]

Controversial book skewers Biden but is ignored by media
By Dan Gainor

Published October 26, 2012



Imagine a scathing look at a vice presidential candidate. Put a "R" after that candidate's name, like Sarah Palin, and you get big-name books, a controversial film and lots of news coverage.
Put a "D" after that candidate's name, even when he's still the sitting vice president, and it gets almost no attention. That's the case with Jeff Connaughton, "a Biden Senate staffer turned lobbyist" who just published a book called "The Payoff" that Politico says "lacerates" the vice president.

As described by the publisher, "Beginning in January 2009, The Payoff" lays bare Washington's culture of power and plutocracy. It's the story of the twenty-month struggle by Senator Ted Kaufman [VP Biden's successor] and Jeff Connaughton, his chief of staff, to hold Wall Street executives accountable for securities fraud, to stop stock manipulation by high-frequency traders, and to break up too-big-to-fail megabanks."

Politico quoted from the book saying Biden was an "egomaniacal autocrat" "determined to manage his staff through fear." Pretty strong stuff, landing just at the peak of a presidential campaign. Most not inside the Beltway might even call it "news."

But it's also been strongly ignored by the news media, forever chasing after Republican scandals. In this case, only a handful of outlets have covered it including Politico, The Washington Post and Al Gore's ever-more-obscure Current TV. The Post gave it all of one paragraph.

Pretty amazing for a book Politico called "angry" and certainly has lots of anti-Biden goodies. "What's remarkable about the book is the lengths that Connaughton goes to portray his former boss and political idol in a bad light, piling up embarrassing anecdotes and examples of when Biden couldn't be bothered to help one of his own aides," Jonathan Martin wrote.

So much for bad stories about the VP just before election, including one where "Biden revealed that he had been upbraided by an angry Obama." Yet, these are exactly the kind of stories the news media would call game changers, which makes one wonder why this book is getting no ink.

But don't hold your breath. The book came out in September and journalists have ignored it this long. It likely won't get coverage until mid-November some time, if then. Just in time to have zero impact on the election.

[Warph]

                   

Romney in Iowa: Obama falls far short
of the magnitude of the times

By: John Hayward
10/26/2012 03:08 PM

Mitt Romney gave a speech in Ames, Iowa today that has been viewed as his "closing argument" for the 2012 campaign – a summary of the case he has brought before the American voter.

"Our campaign is about big things, because we happen to believe that America faces big challenges," said Romney. Obama's campaign, in contrast, "falls far short of the magnitude of the times, and the presidency of the last four years has fallen far short of the promises of his last campaign." He spoke of the many distractions Obama has thrown before the electorate, and criticized the incumbent for dangling "small shiny objects" before voters, when issues of great consequence must be decided.

Romney explained why this election matters so much to American families:

It matters to the senior who needs to get an appointment with a medical specialist but is told by one receptionist after another that the doctor isn't taking any new Medicare patients, because Medicare has been slashed to pay for Obamacare.

It matters to the man from Waukesha, Wisconsin I spoke with several days ago. In what were supposed to be his best work years, he used to have a job at $25 an hour with benefits and now has one at $8 an hour, without benefits.

It matters to the college student, graduating this spring, with 10 to 20 thousand dollars in student debt, who now learns that she also will be paying for 50 thousand dollars in government debt, a burden that will put the American Dream beyond her reach.

It matters for the child in a failing school, unable to go to the school of his parent's choosing, because the teacher's union that funds the President's campaign opposes school choice.

Romney refuted the notion that all of Obama's problems were caused by his predecessor:

What he inherited wasn't the only problem; what he did with what he inherited made the problem worse.

In just four short years, he borrowed nearly $6 trillion, adding almost as much debt held by the public as all prior American presidents in history.

He forced through Obamacare, frightening small business from hiring new employees and adding thousands of dollars to every family's healthcare bill.

He launched an onslaught of new regulations, often to the delight of the biggest banks and corporations, but to the detriment of the small, growing businesses that create two-thirds of our jobs.

New business starts are at a 30-year low because entrepreneurs and investors are sitting on the sidelines, weary from the President's staggering new regulations and proposed massive tax increases.

Many families can't get mortgages and many entrepreneurs can't get loans because of Dodd-Frank regulations that make it harder for banks to lend.

The president invested taxpayer money–your money–in green companies, now failed, that met his fancy, and sometimes were owned by his largest campaign contributors. He spent billions of taxpayer dollars on investments like Solyndra, Tesla, Fisker, and Ener1, which only added to our mounting federal debt.

Romney's speech incorporated the melancholy economic report released today: "Last quarter, our economy grew at just 2%. After the stimulus was passed, the White House promised the economy would now be growing at 4.3%, over twice as fast. Slow economic growth means slow job growth and declining take home pay. This is what four years of President Obama's policies have produced. Americans are ready for change – for growth, for jobs, for more take home pay."

The solution, said Romney, lies not in tax increases that could kill 700,000 more jobs, another wasted "trickle-down government" stimulus bill, or dangerous cuts to American military strength. Instead, he spoke at length about his five-point plan to "renew our faith in the power of free people pursuing their dreams" and strengthen the middle class:

One, we will act to put America on track to a balanced budget by eliminating unnecessary programs, by sending programs back to states where they can be managed with less abuse and less cost, and by shrinking the bureaucracy of Washington.

Two, we'll produce more of the energy we need to heat our homes, fill our cars, and make our economy grow. We will stop the Obama war on coal, the disdain for oil, and the effort to crimp natural gas by federal regulation of the very technology that produces it. We will support nuclear and renewables, but phase out subsidies once an industry is on its feet. And rather than investing in new electric auto and solar companies, we will invest in energy science and research to make discoveries that can actually change our energy world. And by 2020, we will achieve North American energy independence.

Three, we will make trade work for America. We'll open more markets to American agriculture, products, and services. And we will finally hold accountable any nation that doesn't play by the rules. I will stand up for the rights and interests of American workers and employers.

Four, we will grow jobs by making America the best possible place for job creators, for entrepreneurs, for small business, for innovators, for manufacturers. This we will do by updating and reshaping regulations to encourage growth, by lowering tax rates while lowering deductions and closing loopholes, and by making it clear from day one that unlike the current administration, we actually like business and the jobs business creates.

Finally, as we create more opportunity, we also will make sure that our citizens have the skills to succeed. Training programs will be shaped by the states where people live, and schools will put the interests of our kids, their parents, and their teachers above the interests of the teachers' unions.

Those are much better ideas, presented with far more specificity, than anything in Obama's silly "New Economic Patriotism" picture book. It's always odd to hear the President's apologists criticizing anyone else for providing insufficiently detailed plans or having math that doesn't "add up," but the truth is that "fixing" the Obamanomics mess consists in no small part of canceling the Obama policies that have prevented us from having a real recovery. The first step to becoming helpful is to stop being harmful.

Romney promised to seriously address the big issues, including serious health care reform after the ruins of ObamaCare have been cleaned away, and the reforms necessary to ensure Medicare remains solvent. His speech was well-timed and carefully crafted to emphasize his maturity and confidence, versus the increasingly childish and inept Obama:

What this requires is change, change from the course of the last four years. It requires that we put aside the small and the petty, and demand the scale of change we deserve: we need real change, big change.

Our campaign is about that kind of change–confronting the problems that politicians have avoided for over a decade, revitalizing our competitive economy, modernizing our education, restoring our founding principles.

This is the kind of change that promises a better future, one shaped by men and women pursuing their dreams in their own unique ways.

This election is a choice between the status quo — going forward with the same policies of the last four years — or instead, choosing real change, change that offers promise, promise that the future will be better than the past.

If you are ready for that kind of change, if you want this to be a turning point in America's course, join Paul Ryan and me, get your family and friends to join us, and vote now for the kind of leadership that these times demand.

Or you could do what Obama's adolescent campaign suggests, draw the curtains on that voting booth, and pretend you're a virgin on your first hot date with Barry. You can put Joe Biden, who today claimed that Republicans want to give five hundred trillion dollars in tax cuts to the Evil Rich, a heartbeat away from the presidency again. You can settle for an endless New Normal quagmire in which 2 percent GDP growth and 8 percent unemployment are presented as cause for celebration. Maybe the next group of Americans Obama sends into an al-Qaeda hive will actually have some protection, and the cavalry will come when they call for help. Maybe.

[Warph]

Pro-Obama Ad Features Children Singing About
America Where 'Sick People Just Die'

By Noel Sheppard | October 27, 2012 | 12:34

The rabid Left has no limits to indecency.

The advertising agency Goodby, Silverstein & Partners has just released a pro-Obama commercial eerily reminscent of Lyndon Johnson's controversial Daisy ad featuring children singing about a variety of horrors including an America - supposedly under President Romney - where "sick people just die" and "oil fills the sea" (video follows with full lyrics and commentary):



Imagine an America
Where strip mines are fun and free
Where gays can be fixed
And sick people just die
And oil fills the sea

We don't have to pay for freeways!
Our schools are good enough
Give us endless wars
On foreign shores
And lots of Chinese stuff

We're the children of the future
American through and through
But something happened to our country
And we're kinda blaming you

We haven't killed all the polar bears
But it's not for lack of trying
Big Bird is sacked
The Earth is cracked
And the atmosphere is frying

Congress went home early
They did their best we know
You can't cut spending
With elections pending
Unless it's welfare dough

We're the children of the future
American through and through
But something happened to our country
And we're kinda blaming you

Find a park that is still open
And take a breath of poison air
They foreclosed your place
To build a weapon in space
But you can write off your au pair

It's a little awkward to tell you
But you left us holding the bag
When we look around
The place is all dumbed down
And the long term's kind of a drag

We're the children of the future
American through and through
But something happened to our country
And yeah, we're blaming you

You did your best
You failed the test

Mom and Dad
We're blaming you!

Nice, huh?

Remind of you anything?

How about Lyndon Johnson's Daisy ad warning Americans in 1964 that if Barry Goldwater were elected, he'd start a nuclear war?

For those that have forgotten, this disgusting ad ended with a voiceover saying, "These are the stakes! To make a world in which all of God's children can live, or to go into the dark. We must either love each other, or we must die."

Another voiceover (sportscaster Chris Schenkel) then said, "Vote for President Johnson on November 3. The stakes are too high for you to stay home."

Sound a lot like what Goodby and Silverstein have done 48 years later?

The campaign is called The Future Children Project, and it claims, "Re-electing President Obama is a momentous decision that will require every single voter. What would the children of the future say if we let them down this November?"

http://www.futurechildrenproject.com/

For those unfamiliar with this ad agency, they're responsible for campaigns such as "Got Milk?" They also created the Slowskys for Comcast, Denny's free grand slam promotion, and the Budweiser lizards.

Yet according to the San Francisco Chronicle, Silverstein is a Republican.

In name only I quite imagine.

But more importantly, it's one thing to write such disgusting lyrics. It's quite another to get children to sing them.

If the folks at this agency possess such a thing, they should be ashamed of themselves for involving youngsters in this project.

Or do they believe like Goebbels did that it's okay to involve children in spreading propaganda?

Whatever the answer, LBJ's Daisy ad was considered so over the top that the campaign only aired it once.

How many times will Americans be subjected to this new piece of filth?[/font][/size]

[sixdogsmom]

I just watched both of these videos. And I do remember that indeed Goldwater scared the bejesus out of everyone. As far as the group of children is concerned, exactly where is the Obama tie? I did NOT see any tie to the Obama campaign, and if the shoe fits, then wear it as they say. Just sayin' as they say. 

[Warph]

I just watched both of these videos. And I do remember that indeed Goldwater scared the bejesus out of everyone. As far as the group of children is concerned, exactly where is the Obama tie? I did NOT see any tie to the Obama campaign, and if the shoe fits, then wear it as they say. Just sayin' as they say. 

Right... I understand. 


The commercial ad was released by advertising agency Goodby, Silverstein & Partners.
"The two ad men — who have produced some of the country's most- watched ad work, for clients including Foster Farms, Cheetos, Comcast, Denny's and Frito Lay — say they were "inspired by the "90 Days, 90 Reasons" project that asks artists to produce "a reason-a-day countdown 'till the election in support of Barack Obama," according to the SF ad agency."
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/category/goodby-silverstein/



Newsbusters:
"The rabid Left has no limits to indecency.
The advertising agency Goodby, Silverstein & Partners has just released a pro-Obama commercial eerily reminscent of Lyndon Johnson's controversial Daisy ad featuring children singing about a variety of horrors including an America - supposedly under President Romney."
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/10/27/pro-obama-ad-features-children-singing-about-america-where-sick-peopl#ixzz2AZkeAYRS


Also Check out: http://www.bing.com/search?q=Pro-Obama+Ad+Features+Children+Singing+About+America&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IE8SRC

[Warph]

           Glass Jaw O-ba-ma

By Hugh Hewitt
10/29/2012


If Peggy Noonan is correct, and the president's performance in the first debate revealed him to be "[p]etulant, put upon, above it all, full of himself," then the two weeks since have shown him to own what they call in the world of boxing, "a glass jaw."

A glass jaw is the inability of a fighter to take a direct hit, one on the chin, a roundhouse. Once hit, a glass jaw boxer goes down and usually doesn't get back up. If he does manage to get on his feet, he staggers around, lost and confused. for the rest of the fight as his opponent pummels him.

"Staggering around" is the best way to describe the president's actions since the first debate in Denver. Mitt Romney has grown larger, more confident, full of energy and optimism, and not just about his campaign and the election, but for the country.

Barack Obama has grown increasingly gloomy, incoherent and strident, careening from Big Bird to binders to bayonets.

In a panic over falling poll numbers, the president and his ace team of consultants in Chicago rushed out a brand new glossy pamphlet of 20 pages, full of pictures of the president with children, and called it a program for the next few years.

Pundits mocked the transparent ploy and the president grew angrier still. Never --never-- has an incumbent tried to win a second term by glowering at the electorate, but Barack Obama is trying.

The rebuke that is headed his way will come from many directions, but most significantly, polls of the military are showing a huge advantage among those on active duty for Mitt Romney.

Some of that lead might be because of the massive defense cuts the president has already imposed. Some of it might be as a result of Obama's abandoning Iraq without a new "status of forces agreement" in place. Some of it might be the relentless claims of credit for killing bin Laden when everyone in the military (and millions and millions of civilians) know who did the dangerous part.

Among the worst moments of the campaign was the president's dismissiveness of the role of the fleet when Mitt Romney spoke of the need for more ships in the last of the three debate meetings. Shocked sailors and their families heard the president make light of the mission of the Navy, noting that we have aircraft carriers and nuclear subs enough, and asserting that building the fleet beyond what it currently was --283 ships, far below the minimum 313 the Pentagon has said we need-- was akin to buying bayonets.

There are tens of thousands of sailors afloat, far from home in uncomfortable and often dangerous circumstances, who are not serving on carriers or nuclear submarines, but who are projecting the force that defends the United States.

Their pay is low and the jobs hard, and the president is threatening now even their medical care, but they serve on.

The fleet as a whole needs quick action or it will fall to an even smaller size, a provocative weakening in the face of the PRC's naval build-up adn a diminishment of the country's capacity to meet all of the many demands of global leadership it carries. The Navy is the backbone of American power, and the president is cavalier about it before the world. Incredible.

All of this and more --the fact that the SEALs got to bin Laden only because they had a huge and extremely competent fleet behind them extending their reach far forward of the bases from which they operate-- the president dismissed.

It was a shameful moment for the Commander-in-Chief, a low point made worse by the fact his Chicago gang thought it was a brilliant moment, didn't even think how it would sound to the men and women the president leads, and not just in the Navy, but across the entire military.

Such were the actions of the concussed president, his glass jaw shattered and his campaign in ruins.

With ten days left in the campaign, a snarling, angry Obama can and probably will say anything. Mitt Romney will not go to that level and Mitt Romney won't have to. Not only can winners be generous, Mitt Romney is the definition of large-hearted and generous, and the attacks will bounce off him.

But some of us would dearly love to hear one crowd somewhere chant "Glass. Jaw. O. Ba. Ma."
For that is what the president has revealed, and the worst part is realizing that the country's many enemies knew this about him long ago.

[Diane Amberg]

Talk about exploiting children! Disgusting, I don't who it is intended to promote, that is just too much. Makes me heart sick that anyone would stoop so low.

[Warph]

                                             

No executive in the world has more administrative and policy support than the president of the United States.  In addition to the President's Cabinet, Barack Obama has a personal staff of 469 assistants to the president—a record number—almost all of whom are paid more than $100,000 per year.  In addition to this figure, factor in the cost of the benefits, staffs, and offices for 469 presidential assistants. With that done, consider that there is an army of junior presidential assistants supporting the presidential assistants and another army of and secretaries supporting the junior assistants. All of these staffers—taken together—support the president. That's a lot of support.  It is also a lot of money to spend during a time of high unemployment, record-breaking budget deficits, and an anemic economy.

                 

With the largest personal staff in the history of the presidency, one would think Barack Obama had all the help he could possibly need, but apparently this is not the case.  In addition to the Cabinet and his army of presidential assistants, junior assistants, and secretaries, Barack Obama also has a record number of czars on his staff—43 as of this writing.  This number is not a misprint, and you are reading it correctly.  The number of czars reporting to Barack Obama is 43, and this number is still increasing.  Even Bill Clinton had only eight czars.  Why in the world with a fully-staffed cabinet and the largest personal staff in presidential history does Barack Obama need 43 czars?  After all, how much help can one president need?

If you are wondering what a czar does, you are not alone.  Rather than try to explain the elusive term, I will simply list the czars currently on the White House payroll.  In alphabetical order President Obama's czars as of this writing are: Afghanistan/Pakistan Czar, AIDS Czar, Bailout Czar, Border Czar, Car Czar, Cyber Security Czar, Copyright Czar, Climate Czar, Central Region Czar, Disinformation Czar, Domestic Violence Women Czar, Drug Czar, Education Czar, Economy Czar, Energy and Environmental Czar, Export Czar, Government Performance Czar, Faith-Based Czar, Health Czar, Health Insurance Czar, Homeland Security Czar, Great Lakes Czar, Green Jobs Czar, Guantanamo Closure Czar, Information Czar, Intelligence Czar, Labor Czar, Middle East Peace Czar, Pay Czar, Regulatory Czar, Safe Schools Czar, Science Czar, Stimulus Accountability Czar, Sudan Czar, TARP Czar, Technology Czar, Terrorism Czar, Tobacco Czar, Urban Czar, War Czar, Water Czar, Weapons Czar, and Weapons of Mass Destruction Czar.  In addition to these existing positions, several new czars are under consideration including: Zoning Czar, Student Loan Czar, Voter List Czar, Radio-Internet Fairness Czar, Mortgage Czar, Land-Use Czar, and Income Redistribution Czar.

The most commonly heard complaint about czars is that they are hired directly by the president without the advice and consent of Congress. This is a valid criticism.  In his book Presidential Perks Gone Royal, Robert Keith Gray writes: "...the czars constitute a shadow government serving at the pleasure of the president, answerable only to him. A government over which the people and their representatives have no control? In our treasured democracy? Sounds dangerously close to the government of the king of an eastern country or Venezuela's Chavez."  Another valid criticism is the enormous cost of the czars—each paid more than $170,000 per year and each with his or her own costly staff and office operations.  Is it any wonder it costs the American taxpayer more than $2 billion per year to support President Obama? Another valid criticism is that the czars duplicate positions that already exist in the Cabinet or in Congressional committees.  For example, what does the Homeland Security Czar do that is not already being done by the Secretary for Homeland Security and her Department—a cabinet level department with an annual budget of more than $35 million.  Understand that the Homeland Security Czar is NOT part of the Homeland Security Department.

A final valid criticism is that hiring a herd of expensive czars violates one of the promises Barack Obama made while running for president.  According to Robert Keith Gray: "On March 31, 2008, then Senator Barack Obama said, 'The biggest problem that we're facing right now has to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all.  And that's what I intend to reverse when I am President of the United States.'" Indeed? Looks like Barack Obama's czar promise worked out about as well his other promises.  Readers know what that means.
Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/articles/obamas-43-czars-how-much-help-can-one-president-need#ixzz2AkJzo49L

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

This list might be a little dated.  These are the 30 radicals of 43 who are helping Obuma run this country.

OBAMA'S RADICAL CZARS
There are very few of us who know just what all of Obama's Czars do, as they quietly go about their "work" in the nation's capital. This listing of their names and job descriptions should be educational to all Americans, no matter what your political leaning. See who they are and realize what they want to do:



Ed Montgomery
Auto recovery Czar
Radical anti-business black activist. Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks. University of Maryland Business School Dean ; teaches that US business has caused world poverty. ACORN board member. Communist DuBois Club member.


Jeffrey Crowley
AIDS Czar
Radical Homosexual. Gay Rights activist. Believes in Gay Marriage and a Special Status for homosexuals only, including complete free health care for gays.


Alan Bersin
Border Czar
The former failed superintendent of San Diego . Ultra-Liberal friend of Hillary Clinton. Served as Border Czar under Janet Reno - to keep borders open to illegals without interference from the Federal government.


David J. Hayes
California Water Czar
Senior Fellow of radical environmentalist group "Progress Policy". No training or experience in water management whatsoever.


Ron Bloom
Car Czar
Auto Union worker. Anti-business & anti-nuclear. Has worked hard to force US auto makers out of business. Sits on the Board of Chrysler which is now Union-owned. How did this happen? Complete NUT!


Dennis Ross
Central Region Czar
Believes US policy is the cause of war in the Middle East . Obama apologist to the world. Anti-gun and completely Pro-Abortion.


Lynn Rosenthal
Domestic Violence Czar
Director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. Vicious anti-male feminist. Supports male castration - imagine?


Gil Kerlikowske
Drug Czar
Devoted lobbyist for every restrictive gun law proposal, former Chief of Police in liberal Seattle WA . Believes no American should own a firearm. Supports legalization of all drugs.


Paul Volcker (Since resigned)
Economic Czar
Former head of the Federal Reserve under Jimmy Carter when US economy nearly failed. Obama-appointed head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board which engineered the Obama economic disaster to US economy. Member of anti-business "Progressive Policy" organization.


Carol Browner
Energy & Environment Czar
Political Radical. Former head of the EPA - Known for anti-business activism. Strong anti-gun ownership.


Joshua DuBois
Faith-Based Czar
Political Black activist. Degree in Black Nationalism. Anti-gun ownership lobbyist. WHAT THE HELL DOES A FAITH BASED CZAR DO ? ? ?


Cameron Davis
Great Lakes Czar
Chicago radical anti-business environmentalist. Blames George Bush for "Poisoning the water that minorities have to drink." No experience or training in water management whatsoever. Former ACORN Board member (what does that tell us?)


Van Jones
Green Jobs Czar (since resigned)
Black activist with strong anti-white views. Member of American Communist Party and San Francisco Communist Party. Said George Bush caused the 9-11 attacks and wanted Bush investigated by the World Court for war crimes.


Daniel Fried
Guantanamo Closure Czar
Human Rights activist for Foreign Terrorists. Believes America has caused the Global War on Terrorism. Believes terrorists have rights above and beyond Americans.


Nancy-Ann DeParle
Health Czar
Former head of Medicare / Medicaid. Strong proponent of Healthcare Rationing (i.e. "Death Panels"). She is married to a reporter for The New York Times.


Vivek Kundra
Information Czar
Born in New Delhi , India . Controls all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors all private Internet emails. (HELLO?)


Todd Stern
International Climate Czar
Anti-business former White House Chief of Staff. Strong supporter of the Kyoto Accord; pushing hard for Cap and Trade. Blames US business for Global warming. Anti- US business prosperity.


Dennis Blair
Intelligence Czar
Retired US Navy. Stopped US guided missile program he described as "provocative". Chair of ultra-Liberal "Council on Foreign Relations" which blames American organizations for regional wars.



George Mitchell
Mideast Peace Czar
Fmr. Sen from Maine Left wing radical. Has said Israel should be split up into "2 or 3 " smaller more manageable plots". (God forbid) A true Anti-nuclear anti-gun & pro-homosexual "special rights" advocate.



Kenneth Feinberg
Pay Czar
Chief of Staff to Ted Kennedy. Lawyer who got rich off the 9-11 victims payoffs (horribly true).


Cass Sunstein (Resigned)
Regulatory Czar
Liberal activist judge who believes free speech needs to be limited for the "common good"; essentially against the 1st Amendment. Has ruled against personal freedoms many times on private gun ownership and right to free speech cases. This guy has to be run out of Washington ! !



John Holdren
Science Czar
Fierce ideological environmentalist, Sierra Club anti-business activist. Claims US business has caused world poverty. No Science training.


Earl Devaney
Stimulus Accountability Czar
Spent career trying to take guns away from American citizens. Believes in Open Borders to Mexico . Author of statement blaming US gun stores for drug war in Mexico.


J. Scott Gration
Sudan Czar
Native of Democratic Republic of Congo . Believes US does little to help Third World countries. Council of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United Nations.


Herb Allison
TARP Czar
Fannie Mae CEO responsible for the US recession by using real estate mortgages to back up the US stock market. Caused millions of people to lose their life savings.


John Brennan
Terrorism Czar
Anti-CIA activist. No training in diplomatic or gov. affairs. Believes in Open Borders to Mexico and a dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military. A TOTAL MORON !!!!!


Aneesh Chopra
Technology Czar
No Technology training. Worked for the Advisory Board Company, a health care think tank for hospitals. Anti-doctor activist. Supports Obama Healthcare Rationing (i.e. Death Panels) and salaried doctors working exclusively for the Government Healthcare plan.


Adolfo Carrion Jr.
Urban Affairs Czar
Puerto Rico-born Anti-American activist and leftist group member in Latin America. Millionaire "slum lord" of Bronx, NY. Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got from "sweetheart" deals with labor unions. Wants higher taxes on middle class to pay for minority housing and healthcare.


Ashton Carter
Weapons Czar
Leftist. Wants all private weapons in US destroyed. Supports UN ban on firearms ownership in America. No other "policy".


Gary Samore
WMD Policy Czar
Former US Communist. Wants US to destroy all WMD unilaterally as a show of good faith. Has no other "policy"

[Warph]

Watching the Collapse of the Obama Campaign

By Jack Kelly - October 29, 2012


The Navy needs more ships, Mitt Romney said in last Monday's debate. It has fewer now than in 1916.

President Barack Obama pounced. "Well, governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed," he said, his voice dripping with sarcasm. "We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them ... "

In the spin room, some journalists laughed and applauded. Liberals imagine themselves to be intellectually and morally superior to conservatives. They love to put them down.

But "sarcasm and condescension only work if the speaker's presumption of lofty superior knowledge is borne out by his command of actual facts," said Pastor Donald Sensing, a retired Army colonel.

Mr. Obama was wrong on both the thrust of his argument, and on the examples he used. Aircraft carriers need smaller ships to protect them, lest they be sunk. The military has many more bayonets now than in 1916. Marines think so highly of them they've designed a new one, modeled on the famous KA-BAR fighting knife. Special Forces soldiers on horseback were critical to ousting the Taliban.
The facts matter little to liberals. Their assumption of intellectual superiority isn't based on actual knowledge. Journalists declared the president the winner of the debate.

But facts and civility do matter to most Americans. A CBS panel of undecided voters in Ohio chose Mr. Romney, 6-2. A video of the dismay of CBS "This Morning" co-host Norah O'Donnell when this was reported is zipping across the Internet.

The Navy and shipbuilding are very important in southeast Virginia. With his wisecrack, the president may have kissed the state goodbye.

It isn't just in Virginia where Mr. Obama's fortunes are plummeting. When Missouri isn't a swing state, but Minnesota is, Democrats are in big trouble. No challenger who's cracked 50 percent in Gallup's tracking poll has ever lost. Mr. Romney is polling better at this point in the campaign than did every victorious challenger from 1968 on.

It's hard to see how the president can mount a comeback. His strategy of demonizing Mitt Romney collapsed when Americans saw in the first debate the GOP candidate has neither horns nor hooves. In an NBC/WSJ poll Monday, 62 percent of respondents said they want "significant change" from Mr. Obama's policies, but he's offered little in the way of an agenda for a second term. Instead he makes excuses, and ever more petty attacks. Voters now think Mr. Romney is just as "likeable" as Mr. Obama.

So the question may not be whether Mr. Romney will win, but by how much. When this dawns on Ms. O'Donnell, the video will be priceless.

Our politics are now so polarized I doubt that any candidate in either party -- not even JFK or Ronald Reagan -- could win much more than 52 percent of the popular vote. But law professor and blogger Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) thinks the odds of a preference cascade are rising.

Economist Timur Kuran coined the term to explain why totalitarian regimes usually collapse suddenly. A preference cascade happens when people discover millions of others share their doubts about the Great Leader. Massive media bias has made the term applicable here, Mr. Reynolds said. The Barack Obama that Americans saw in the debates bears little resemblance to the heroic figure portrayed by the news media.

The crowds have been enormous at Romney/Ryan events this past week. If this is the start of a preference cascade, many Democrats may drown in the undertow. The Obama campaign has vacuumed up so much Democratic money there's little left for other candidates.

In yet another fund-raising appeal on Tuesday, Mr. Obama said he and Michelle would be fine if he loses. If the president's friends are indeed buying him a $35 million mansion in Hawaii, as Chicago blogger Kevin Dujan (Hillbuzz) claims, that's certainly true. But public employee unions, crony capitalists and others who feed at the public trough have reason to panic.

Underlings must wonder if there will be legal consequences for the laws they've broken. I predict an orgy of document shredding Nov. 7.

The biggest losers could be "mainstream" journalists. Their blatant bias has dropped trust in the news media to an all-time low. It'll plunge further if more evidence of collusion with the administration emerges. Nobody trusts a liar. There will be bankruptcies.[/b]