Nipple for 2nd Generation Colt 1851 Navy

Started by Okefinokee Outlaw, May 30, 2016, 09:05:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Okefinokee Outlaw

I purchased an unfired 2nd generation Colt 1851 C series revolver.  The nipples are too slim to even hold a #10 cap, so I purchased replacement nipples that hold a #11 cap from Track of the Wolf.  The problem is that the #11's bind on the little ridge machined into the part of the gun behind the cylinder.  I switched out the nipples from my 2nd generation 1860 Army that hold #10's well, and the 1851 functions fine with the #10 caps.  Might anyone know where I can obtain replacement nipples that hold #10 caps.? 

Okefinokee Outlaw

After some more fiddling, and also having the same issue occasionally with the #10 nipples from my 1860 installed on my 1851, this may not be a nipple problem after all.  On my 1860 Army, I can pull the hammer to half cock when all caps are in place and rotate the cylinder.  On my 1851 Navy, unless the hammer goes all the way forward, it will not go to a half or full cock.  So when no caps are installed, I can half and full cock all day long.  But when the caps are installed, only after firing will I be able to SOMETIMES cock; it is still hanging up from time to time.  Sounds like maybe a timing issue? 

Coffinmaker

Yes.  No.  and ..... TA DA!!  Maybe.  First one up for bids.  The nipples stand too tall up out of the cylinder.  Last bunch of 2d Gen Colt
51 Navies I worked on, accepted SlixShot nipples for Uberti.  Little anti-seize lube and they spun right in. Function with #10 Remington
caps was just right.

With the too tall nipples, the hammer isn't being allowed to travel far enough forward to release and re-set the locking bolt.  There are two
ways to solve the issue.  Well, maybe three.  Relieve the bolt arm at the cam, bevel the release side, re-polish, test for function.  Repeat as necessary. 2.  Pull the nipples you got from TOW, put em inna lathe, turn em down to the correct height, then re-machine the sides so #10
caps will fit again.  3.  Return the incorrect height nipples to TOW.  Fit a set of SlixShot and see what you get.

Before I would even think of doing #1 or #2, the incorrect nipples would go back to TOW.

Coffinmaker

Okefinokee Outlaw

Thanks Coffinmaker.  I'll go the SlixShot route and see what happens.  12-28 threads, correct?

Fingers McGee

What Coffinmaker said

2nd Gens take Uberti nipples and spare parts.  SlixShots work really well.
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee;
SASS Regulator 28654 - L - TG; NCOWS 3638
AKA Man of many Colts; Diabolical Ken's alter ego; stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman/Pistoleer; Rangemaster
Founding Member - Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Member - Southern Missouri Rangers;
NRA Patron Life: GOA; CCRKBA; SAF; SV-114 (CWO4 ret); STORM 327

"Cynic:  A blackguard whose faulty vision sees thing as they are, not as they should be"  Ambrose Bierce

LonesomePigeon

I have a Colt 2nd Gen F-Series. I replaced the nipples with Slix Shot's Uberti nipples from Longhunter, they fit the gun and caps perfectly.

http://www.longhunt.com/storelh/index.php?route=product/product&path=88_97&product_id=267


Okefinokee Outlaw


Okefinokee Outlaw

I'm wondering if another contributing factor might be that the gap between the forcing cone and cylinder is virtually immeasurable.  Perhaps I should stone this a bit to create a gap of a few thousandths?  Even with the wedge halfway in, there is virtually no gap.

LonesomePigeon

Sounds like the arbor is too short. There's an order you should go in to fix the cylinder gap, first correct arbor fit , then wedge fit then if necessary stone the forcing cone... I think. Other people know more and hopefully they will chime in.

Okefinokee Outlaw

Checked the arbor length, and it is absolutely perfect.  With the cylinder out, I started the barrel assembly upside down and rotated till it met with the frame, and it is dead on.  I'll wait till I install the new nipples before doing anything further.

Coffinmaker

There are TWO tests the gun MUST pass.  You have done the first.  Normally though, A Uberti sourced barrel will not fully seat on the
arbor because they are also too tight of fit.  The inside of the bore in the barrel lug need clean'd up.  There ARE burrs.  The end of the
arbor need polished.  The barrel should slide easily onto the arbor until you can FEEL it bottom out.  Then do the "turn the barrel"
test.  The second test is with the Cylinder in.  Add the barrel and check the barrel to cylinder gap with a feeler gauge.  Then instal
the wedge where it is suppose to be (spring hook proud) and recheck the barrel/cylinder gap.  Should be the same.  Should  NOT
close up.

If you take a close look at the frame recoil shield, you will notice a raised thrust ring.  In rotation, the cylinder rides that ring (remember to grease it).  The barrel cannot force the cylinder any farther back.  When the gun is cocked, the hand pushes the cylinder forward, away
from the recoil shield.  Too little cylinder gap can cause the gun to Jam but will have nothing to do with too tall nipples.

Coffinmaker

Okefinokee Outlaw

Redid first test and the fit is perfect.  The barrel slides easily onto the arbor and I could feel it bottom out.  Also checked for burrs.

With barrel installed with cylinder in, without the wedge installed, the gap is .011.

With wedge installed, the gap is .006.

45 Dragoon

If the arbor is bottoming out, should be no change.  Also, shouldn't be able to lock up cyl. by driving the wedge in. Yours would be the first I've heard  of the 2nd gens that didn't have a short arbor (or any of the "gens" for that matter .  .  . except the first of course!! ).

A tight barrel/cyl clearance is more efficient and leaves the revolver much cleaner. Mr. Pettifogger has an excellent article about how to correct the arbor "problem". I'm sure a savy techno. poster can post a link .  .  .   (that wouldn't be me).


Mike
www.goonsgunworks.com
Follow me on Instagram @ goonsgunworks

Coffinmaker

You may be mistaking the feel of the lower barrel lug bottoming against the frame at the locator pins.  If the relationship of the barre to
arbor fit and lower frame is correct, the wedge cannot change the barrel to cylinder gap.

If I were going to bet paychecks, I'd bet your arbor is about .005 too short and needs to be shimmed.

Coffinmaker

Okefinokee Outlaw

I'm inserting the arbor into the barrel assembly with the locator pins rotated away from the frame.  When I hold it tight and rotate, the matchup is absolutely perfect.

45 Dragoon

Just drop a thin washer in the arbor hole and assemble. I bet you will be able to.
I'm pretty sure you can lock up the cyl by taping in the wedge. (Both of these will show a short arbor) (by the way, Colts own instructions say to tap the wedge in and out. You can't remove the "necessary" assembly clearances with just a finger tight wedge.)


The taper fit is not the proper nor is it the original design. Pietta seems to be the only one to step up to the plate and has addressed the problem (somewhat. I set them to a much tighter clearance but they are a much better setup than Uberti's "system")

Mike
www.goonsgunworks.com
Follow me on Instagram @ goonsgunworks

Okefinokee Outlaw

I have some .005 brass sheet, so I fabricated a small piece that dropped into the arbor hole.  Doing this created a very very small gap between the barrel assembly and frame, so I'm guessing that at most it's only .003 short.  Could such a small dimension create havoc?

45 Dragoon

In a word .  .  .  .  .  yes.  That's what allows wedges to be beaten to death.  The arbor must have GOOD contact with the barrel to allow for energy transmission. As long as there is a buffer (space of any kind) the two assemblies will vibrate at different rates which is very destructive. With good contact, the assys will act as a solid unit. This is an easy job for the wedge and is what protects  the wedge (and arbor/barrel contact points).
This is also what "defines" the barrel/ cylinder clearance. Tapping (more like smacking) the wedge in place removes all the play/ tollerances between the assys., produces a "solid" (acting) frame and defines the aforementioned bbl/cyl clearance. Just so we're on the same page, I measure the clearance in "as fired " position (cylinder locked, hammer down while pulling cylinder fully to the rear). My number for the clearance is .002" and I use steel shims (rather than brass) held in the arbor hole with a steel impregnated epoxy (JB).
  Now, you will have the same revolver each time you assemble it and it will act and shoot as a solid frame revolver (as designed). The fact that the cyl contacts the forcing cone each time you cycle the action is what allows the .002" bbl/cyl clearance (and why it's a clearance and not a gap).  So, it's "self cleaning" and will keep fouling to a minimum and will allow all day shooting without any cylinder binding.

Mike
www.goonsgunworks.com
Follow me on Instagram @ goonsgunworks

Pettifogger

I never just drop a washer into the arbor hole.  The barrel/arbor gap varies greatly between guns.  I have measured the gap from around .010 to well over .060".  I hand fit each spacer to a particular gun.  Once the barrel to arbor fit is corrected it should last a lifetime.

45 Dragoon

I don't either. I knew if the "perfect fit" was still perfect after dropping a washer in, he'd get the idea  it ain't perfect.  I was just proving a point.


Mike
www.goonsgunworks.com
Follow me on Instagram @ goonsgunworks

© 1995 - 2024 CAScity.com