Dress / Undress Uniforms

Started by Whiskey Double, November 22, 2018, 09:09:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Buffalo Creek Law Dog

Quote from: 1961MJS on November 27, 2018, 09:17:58 AM
Yep, everybody WITH Custer got killed.  Not lucky,  from what i read, the 4th under Bad Hand was the best.  The Colonel did die "crazy" though.

Later

The 7th Cavalry had a 51% casualty rate at the Little Big Horn River on June 25-26, 1876
SASS 66621
BOLD 678
AFS 43
NFA
ABPA

1961MJS

Quote from: Buffalo Creek Law Dog on November 27, 2018, 01:05:16 PM
The 7th Cavalry had a 51% casualty rate at the Little Big Horn River on June 25-26, 1876

Yes, the ones WITH George died.  Some of the ones WITH Reno and Benteen survived.  51% total.

Mike
Mike
BOSS #230

Brevet Lieutenant Colonel
Division of Oklahoma

Drydock

Prior to the engagement, Custer split the 7th into 3 combat commands for tactical reasons.  Custer took 7 companies off to the northwest to attack the encampment.  Those 7 companies under his direct command were wiped out.  The remaining companies under Reno and Benteen would retrench on heights east of the encampment, and survive.

Thus Custer's command suffered 100% casualties, even though a slim majority of the regiment survived. 
Civilize them with a Krag . . .

1961MJS

Quote from: Pitspitr on November 27, 2018, 12:43:44 PM
Well, it's said that that was because he, "got lucky" one too many times.  ::) ;)

BTW, the right wool is sometimes cooler than cotton. I sometimes "cheat" and don't wear a shirt under my khaki blouse. I do like my whites as well, but they did get a little muddy at the last banquet.

Hi, you know how Jeff Foxworthy says "We just can't have nice things."  Well, me wearing white is a recipe for stains.  Never spilled soy sauce on camouflage or black pants.  This is especially bad because we usually have BBQ for the banquet.  

On an actual Dress / Undress Uniform note. I saw a picture of the 1895 and the guy was wearing pants the same color as the jacket.

Later

Mike
BOSS #230

Brevet Lieutenant Colonel
Division of Oklahoma

Pitspitr

Quote from: 1961MJS on November 28, 2018, 11:20:26 AMWell, me wearing white is a recipe for stains.
I had use a bunch of Scotchguard on them for that reason, so was a little surprised that they held the mud

Quote from: 1961MJS on November 28, 2018, 11:20:26 AMOn an actual Dress / Undress Uniform note. I saw a picture of the 1985 and the guy was wearing pants the same color as the jacket.
Could he have been a staff officer and so wearing the dark trousers?
I remain, Your Ob'd Servant,
Jerry M. "Pitspitr" Davenport
(Bvt.)Brigadier General Commanding,
Grand Army of the Frontier
BC/IT, Expert, Sharpshooter, Marksman, CC, SoM
NRA CRSO, RVWA IIT2; SASS ROI, ROII;
NRA Benefactor Life; AZSA Life; NCOWS Life

1961MJS

Quote from: Pitspitr on November 29, 2018, 09:54:03 AM
I had use a bunch of Scotchguard on them for that reason, so was a little surprised that they held the mud
Could he have been a staff officer and so wearing the dark trousers?

I wondered about the second part with the Dark Trousers as I found pictures of Cavalry wearing the later Sky Blue ones with the 1895 also.  Not sure what I'll do.  Wearing the 1895 as a dress uniform, I would probably wear shoes not high topped Cavalry boots and I think DRESS navy blue would look better.  Since buying both a Krag Rifle AND Carbine I got choices.

Do they make buckets of Scotchguard?  I'd have to dip white pants and probably the blouse too.

Later
Mike
BOSS #230

Brevet Lieutenant Colonel
Division of Oklahoma

© 1995 - 2024 CAScity.com