Buckle suggestions?

Started by waffenmacht, March 10, 2009, 10:51:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

waffenmacht

Hey guys,
  I am working on a unique gunbelt design.  I want something different, but historically accurate.  I am wanting to use some type of buckle that is not a "typical" belt buckle.  I have been quite inspired by the mix/match gun rig of Frank James.  So what are your suggestions?  Would a CS belt buckle be common?  How about something more "industrial" like a common buckle specific to a saddle or other horse rigging?  Maybe a bit of Texas/Mexican influence made from whatever was laying around at the time?  Let's hear your suggestions.

Dr. Bob

Ya might head over to Will Ghormley's site and look at his buckles.  He took the motif from one in Packing Iron.

          http://www.willghormley-maker.com/OWCBuckles.html

That should take you right there!

Ya might also check out the selection of buckles at Fall Creek Sutlery.

        http://fcsutler.com/fcbuckles.asp

Those would be good places to start!  Good shopping! ;D
Regards, Doc
Dr. Bob Butcher,
NCOWS 2420, Senator
HR 4
GAF 405,
NRA Life,
KGC 8.
Warthog
Motto: Clean mind  -  Clean body,   Take your pick

waffenmacht

Big thanks Bob. FCSutler has a HUGE selection.  I am seriously leaning towards using a military buckle.

ChuckBurrows

aka Nolan Sackett
Frontier Knifemaker & Leathersmith

Dr. Bob

Chuck,

Thanks!  I couldn't for the life of me remember their name. ::) ::)  Got the CRS bad sometimes! ;) ;D
Regards, Doc
Dr. Bob Butcher,
NCOWS 2420, Senator
HR 4
GAF 405,
NRA Life,
KGC 8.
Warthog
Motto: Clean mind  -  Clean body,   Take your pick

Sir Charles deMouton-Black

Pards;  It is my understanding that CSA bits'n pieces were prohibited for a long time after the war.  If so, a CSA buckle would not be seen anywhere in these unite of states.   I have it on good authority that the Idaho & Oregon territories were strongholds of the G.A.R. who would have made sure such rules were not broken.
NCOWS #1154, SCORRS, STORM, BROW, 1860 Henry, Dirty Rat 502, CHINOOK COUNTRY
THE SUBLYME & HOLY ORDER OF THE SOOT (SHOTS)
Those who are no longer ignorant of History may relive it,
without the Blood, Sweat, and Tears.
With apologies to George Santayana & W. S. Churchill

"As Mark Twain once put it, "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."

waffenmacht

What do you guys say about the above statement.  While i dont doubt that in many areas pro-CSA items may have been prohibited, it was probably also illegal to gamble, rape, murder and rob.  I wonder just how much time was spent enforcing a "CSA" ban in areas like Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and California?  Chuck, maybe you can chime in, have you seen many instances where CSA buckles were used post-war?

RollingThunder

While the humilities placed on the conquered people of the south by the conquerors were numerous, in occupied lands and territories, the laws were usually tempered by the gains, as they are nowadays. Alexander's example still stands, centuries later.

In other words, I doubt they would send any large military or civilian legal authority after someone holding up their britches with an old belt that happened to be CSA issue. They might use it as a point of initial offense, but I highly doubt they'd chase down Texans driving stock over a belt buckle, unless that served as a reason to detain the person until more suitable larger charges could be drawn and proven.

Then again, history is riddled with such foolishness.

In all, it's more likely the CSA buckles would have been confiscated up north in Union prisons, and replaced with twine or rope or strips of cloth if belts were not to be afforded to prisoners. If you're talking about down south, I'm not sure the occupying forces would have made too fine a point of a belt buckle because there would be too much to be lost through humiliation and resentment, and very little gained. Now ... a full rebel uniform might be a different story. In the end, though a man has to keep warm and keep his pants up.

Chances are, a plain round buckle would be issued towards the end of the war anyway, because of the need for clothing metals to be limited so they could be used in the production of munitions. While a man does indeed need to keep his pants up, a small brass buckle will do the job just as well as a large brass one will, at a great deal less cost, and a savings of diverted metals to munitions.

Seem sound to anyone else? Any war historians that could point to the real likelihood?
Just because you CAN ride the hide off a horse, doesn't mean you should.

http://www.youtube.com/artroland - The home of Backyard Horsemanship!

© 1995 - 2024 CAScity.com