To flute or not to flute?

Started by Flinch Morningwood, January 15, 2007, 10:14:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Flinch Morningwood

Looking at getting a R&D conversion cylider from Taylors for my 1858...Any opinions out there on getting fluted or non-fluted??? 

Any historical comments on either?

Thanks in advance!
"I'll kill a man in a fair fight. Or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight."

- Jayne Cobb

Marshal Will Wingam

Stay with the non-fluted ones. They are period correct. I haven't seen an original one with flutes.

SCORRS     SASS     BHR     STORM #446

Tuolumne Lawman

Howdy,

The original two piece conversion cylinders with no loading notches/gates (and one piece gated) were all unfluted.  I shoot a Taylor's Uberti  factory  "gated" conversion 1858 and a forged frame Uberti 1858 with R&D, mostly using 45 Schofield, which is close to the .46 French rimfire that was used in the first Remington conversions in 1866 or 1867.
TUOLUMNE LAWMAN
CO. F, 12th Illinois Cavalry  SASS # 6127 Life * Spencer Shooting Society #43 * Motherlode Shootist Society #1 * River City Regulators

Ransom Gaer

My inclination is to go unfluted.  That is what I did when I got my R&D cylinders.  They are more period correct and that is im portant to me.  For what that's worth.  Also I think the unfluted might be just a little stronger.  But that is my opinion, not necessarily based on any evidence.

Ransom Gaer
Pvt Ransom Geer Co D 34th Virginia Infantry Regiment
SCORRS
Soot Lord
Warthog
STORM

© 1995 - 2024 CAScity.com