Confederate Navy Brass Frame .44: Completely Historically Inaccurate?

Started by Megabutter, February 29, 2012, 09:41:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

Megabutter

#20
March 02, 2012, 02:22:50 PM
Look at all those fictitious firearms!  I had no idea. I have to ask the question "why"?  Of course the answer is why not.  I'm sure most people aren't concerned or overly concerned with historical accuracy.

Great info guys.  Thanks again.

River City John

#21
March 02, 2012, 04:27:53 PM
Fine. Now that I is thoroughly edumacated . . .

Rebated brass frame Colt 1851 in 44 = Pfffft! ;)

RCJ
"I was born by the river in a little tent, and just like the river I've been running ever since." - Sam Cooke
"He who will not look backward with reverence, will not look forward with hope." - Edmund Burke
". . .freedom is not everything or the only thing, perhaps we will put that discovery behind us and comprehend, before it's too late, that without freedom all else is nothing."- G. Warren Nutter
NCOWS #L146
GAF #275

Megabutter

#22
March 03, 2012, 09:52:14 PM
Quote from: River City John on March 02, 2012, 04:27:53 PM
Fine. Now that I is thoroughly edumacated . . .

Rebated brass frame Colt 1851 in 44 = Pfffft! ;)

RCJ

Rebated brass frame griswold and gunnison 1851 in 44!  Geez, get your fictitious historically inaccurate guns right!   ;D ;) ;) ;D

litl rooster

#23
March 03, 2012, 10:13:51 PM
Quote from: Hoof Hearted on March 01, 2012, 01:37:33 PM
WOW!

It appears that "3 Fingers Murphy" Is Mako in disguise :o


;D


Load 'em if you got 'em............
Mathew 5.9
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
© 1995 - 2024 CAScity.com