Author Topic: Smokeless in Brass Shotshells  (Read 3826 times)

Offline Prof. A. Wickwire

  • Very Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 80
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Smokeless in Brass Shotshells
« on: May 21, 2007, 02:57:04 PM »
Howdy All,

Does anyone have (or have a link to) reloading data for using smokeless powder in brass shotgun shells?

All of the data that I have been able to find is for black powder.  At this time I am not ready to transition over to black powder, but would like to use brass shotshells.  I am also not brave (or foolish) enough to reload them by trial and error.

Thanks for your help.

Sincerely,

Prof. A. Wickwire
Now where did I put that fuming nitric acid?

Does anyone smell smoke?

NCOWS# 2511
NRA# 080060344
NYSRPA# 11983
SASS# 39766

Offline Driftwood Johnson

  • Driftwood Johnson
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1887
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Smokeless in Brass Shotshells
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2007, 09:12:41 AM »
Howdy

I don't think you will find any reliable published data for loading Smokeless into brass shotshells.

Smokeless powder is much less forgiving in a shotshell than Black Powder is. Basically, you cannot put enough Black Powder into a gun in good shape to hurt it. That is not the case with Smokeless. The makers of Smokeless Powders go through great effort developing specific recipes for various combinations of hulls, primers, powder, wad, and shot. They run all these loads through pressure barrels to verify the pressures are within safe limits. The nature of Smokeless shotshell reloading is such that randomly substituting any one component in a specific recipe can have unknown effects on pressure.

Frankly, I don't think the market for brass shotshells is big enough that the powder manufacturers want to bother coming up with recipes for brass shotshells. Without being tested in pressure barrels, I would be very leery of any data that I happened to come across. I would not trust anything that the powder manufacturers themselves had not actually tested in a pressure barrel, and I do not think they are interested in developing loads for Smokeless in brass shotshells.
That’s bad business! How long do you think I’d stay in operation if it cost me money every time I pulled a job? If he’d pay me that much to stop robbing him, I’d stop robbing him.

Ya probably inherited every penny ya got!

Offline St. George

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4834
  • NCOWS , GAF, B.O.L.D., Order of St. George, SOCOM,
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Smokeless in Brass Shotshells
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2007, 10:38:58 AM »
I've shot a lot of all-brass shotshells - but they were all OO Buck, as loaded for our Ithacas, and were considered a combat load.

The data was identical for both paper and all-brass: 26 grains of dense smokeless propellant - equal to a 3 3/4 dram equivalent of bulk powder.

DuPont MX was used, as well, since it was a multi-based powder.

Unfortunately - that's not going to do you an awful lot of good, unless you essentially mimic the standard commercial OO Buck load of today, and that's for a modern firearm in good condition.

Using an equivalent load in something older could prove disasterous.

Best to continue researching.

Good Luck.

Vaya,

Scouts Out!





"It Wasn't Cowboys and Ponies - It Was Horses and Men.
It Wasn't Schoolboys and Ladies - It Was Cowtowns and Sin..."

Advertising

  • Guest
Re: Smokeless in Brass Shotshells
« Reply #3 on: Today at 02:57:50 AM »

Offline BlaiseNSaddles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 164
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Smokeless in Brass Shotshells
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2007, 05:24:55 PM »
I know that Hammerdouble brass shotshells say they are good for smokeless and the company will provide loading data if you write.

Also they print this on their site:

 Load data from any reputable powder manufactures manual is fine with any of our shells; just replace the suggested wad column with Hammer Double™ wads (wads are included free with our shells).

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com